The Elise Engima – Who was She?

Elisabeth_Röckel julianeTherese_Malfatti_Anonymus

Top: Elizabeth
Middle: Juliane
Bottom: Therese
 The Three Faces of “Elise”
Who was She?

“Who was she?” is still an enigma because of competing theories, but of the three pictured above, Theory I below seems to me to be the most plausible.

Theory I: She was reputed to be Therese Malfatti (1 January 1792 – 27 April 1851), who was an Austrian musician and a pupil of Ludwig van Beethoven. He fell in love with her and decided to propose marriage to her. His plans came to naught. On her death, the original manuscript was found in her effects. It was taken to a music publisher, who immediately recognized the notation as being in Beethoven’s hand and decided to publish it posthumously. He published it under the title Bagatelle, but apparently misread the dedication. “Für Elise” appeared on the top of the title page, and the piece – quite possibly the most famous piano music Beethoven ever composed, probably because practically anyone can play it! – has been known by that name ever since.

Theory II – According to a 2010 study by Klaus Martin Kopitz, there is evidence that the piece was written for the German soprano singer Elisabeth Röckel (1793–1883), later the wife of Johann Nepmuk Hummel.  “Elise” – as she was called by a parish priest (she also called herself “Betty”) – had been a friend of Beethoven’s since 1808.

Theory III – In 2012, the Canadian musicologist Rita Steblin suggested that Juliane Katharine Elisabet Barensfeld, who used “Elise” as a variant first name, might be the dedicatee. Born in Regensburg and treated for a while as a child prodigy, she first travelled on concert tours with Beethoven’s friend Johann Nepomuk Malzel, also from Regensburg, and then lived with him for some time in Vienna where she received singing lessons from Antonio Salieri. Steblin argues that Beethoven dedicated this work to the 13-year-old Elise Barensfeld as a favour to Therese Malfatti who lived opposite Mälzel’s and Barensfeld’s residence and who might have given her piano lessons. Steblin admits that question marks remain for her hypothesis.



An MP3 version of the piece can be found here, performed by Valentina Lisitsa:

The score of Für Elise was not published until 1867, 40 years after Beethoven’s death in 1827. The discoverer of the piece, Ludwig Nohl, affirmed that the original autographed manuscript, now lost, was dated 27 April 1810.

Then, along came German organ scholar Johannes Quack, who proffered the idea that the letters that spell Elise could be decoded as the first three notes of the piece. Because an E♭ is called an Es in German and is pronounced as “S”, that makes E–(L)–(I)–S–E: E–(L)–(I)–E♭–E, which by enharmonic equivalents sounds the same as the written notes E–(L)–(I)–D♯–E.

So there you have it! Three plausible theories of which only one can be truly authentic, or authenticated by musicologists.

Why not weigh in with your own determination – Theory I, II or III! – by e-mailing me at when you feel that you do have a definitive answer.

– Multiple sources used, including Wikipedia and Encyclopedia of Concert Music –

6 thoughts on “The Elise Engima – Who was She?

    1. I’m glad you liked it. I’ve collected six months of my writings as “Azim Lewis Mayadas Blog [January – June 2015]: some of my thoughts, written down – vol. 1” with Dark Green Cover that is now available via Amazon.
      PS: An earlier unformatted version of the 106-page book with Light Green Cover was supposed to have been deleted by Amazon end-June, but it still carries it despite my complaint last week, causing some confusion. I’ve since been assured that the faulty issue has been removed, but I felt it was important that my disclaimer should be made public, especially to those who have commented favorably on my blogs so as to avoid any untoward purchase of the earlier version – thanks!
      PPS: The forthcoming Volume 2 (July – December 2015) will I hope not suffer from the glitch that the release of Volume 1 suffered from at the time of rollout last month.

  1. Thank you a lot for providing individuals with remarkably remarkable chance to read critical reviews from this blog. It’s usually so ideal plus packed with a great time for me and my office colleagues to visit your blog more than thrice every week to learn the fresh secrets you have got. And definitely, I am certainly amazed concerning the stunning tricks you give. Some two ideas on this page are unequivocally the finest we have ever had.

  2. I happen to be writing to let you know of the cool encounter my friend’s girl gained visiting your web site. She discovered such a lot of details, which included how it is like to possess a very effective giving mindset to make many people with ease gain knowledge of several tortuous subject matter. You undoubtedly did more than people’s desires. Many thanks for supplying such essential, safe, explanatory and as well as easy guidance on the topic to Gloria.

  3. Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an extraordinarily spectacular possiblity to discover important secrets from here. It is usually so ideal and as well , stuffed with a good time for me personally and my office fellow workers to search your blog a minimum of 3 times per week to see the latest stuff you have. And lastly, I am just at all times motivated with the remarkable opinions served by you. Selected 4 facts in this post are truly the most efficient I’ve had.

  4. Thanks so much for giving everyone an exceptionally terrific opportunity to discover important secrets from here. It’s usually very beneficial and also jam-packed with a lot of fun for me personally and my office friends to search your web site on the least thrice per week to see the new stuff you will have. And lastly, I am also always happy with the perfect principles you serve. Selected two tips in this posting are truly the most efficient we have all had.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *